versatilequeen:

infamousnfamous:

gabbiegabstoomuch:

batmanliveshere:

beyonceinfo:

The Evolution of CRAZY IN LOVE - LIVE

This needs to be on everybody’s blog

Beyonce is a fucking goddess

My heart

Ok, I got goosebumps. Must reblog.

chauvinistsushi:

bedhead-and-cigarettes:

finalblessing:

will smith everybody

he’s so aggressively proud and determined to direct attention to his wife and son. first he’s like, LOOK AT THIS BEAUTY AND STRENGTH AND POWER AND SHE AGREED TO MARRY ME,  and then with his son, he’s like LOOK, I MADE A THING, AND I AM PROUD OF THIS THING THAT I MADE.

I MADE A THING

akanedee:

if you ever call me annoying, even if it’s just jokingly, the chances of me ever speaking to you again are slim to none because I’ll be so afraid that every little word or sound that comes out of my mouth will aggravate you and make you cringe and hate my existence

eightless:

White People Calling Kanye West Racist: A Collection

redfivetwo:

zjemptv:

anadhelp:

May is Mental Health Awareness Month—it’s time we start talking about mental illness & break the silence.

“It’s helpful to have parents set limits on things like cross-dressing, which many parents have not done before coming to us.”
“Told of the Andersons and their plans to enroll Nicole in school as a girl, Zucker says he’s concerned that the Andersons have been swayed by an activist transsexual agenda and are ignoring the possibility that Nicole might simply be a troubled child. ‘Let’s see if there are ways to try and help this child work this through,’ he says. ‘Instead, they’re going to cement this in more and more.’ He says that what the Andersons are doing could be considered ‘some type of emotional neglect.’”
“Zucker, who has worked with this population for close to 30 years, has a very specific method for treating these children. Whenever Zucker encounters a child younger than 10 with gender identity disorder, he tries to make the child comfortable with the sex he or she was born with. So, to treat Bradley, Zucker explained to Carol that she and her husband would have to radically change their parenting. Bradley would no longer be allowed to spend time with girls. He would no longer be allowed to play with girlish toys or pretend that he was a female character. Zucker said that all of these activities were dangerous to a kid with gender identity disorder. He explained that unless Carol and her husband helped the child to change his behavior, as Bradley grew older, he likely would be rejected by both peer groups. Boys would find his feminine interests unappealing. Girls would want more boyish boys. Bradley would be an outcast.”
“Zucker says the homosexuality metaphor is wrong. He proposes another metaphor: racial identity disorder. ‘Suppose you were a clinician and a 4-year-old black kid came into your office and said he wanted to be white. Would you go with that? … I don’t think we would,’ Zucker says. If a black kid walked into a therapist’s office saying he was really white, the goal of pretty much any therapist out there would be to make him try to feel more comfortable being black. They would assume his mistaken beliefs were the product of a dysfunctional environment — a dysfunctional family or a dysfunctional cultural environment that led him or her to engage in this wrongheaded and dangerous fantasy. This is how Zucker sees gender-disordered kids. He sees these behaviors primarily as a product of dysfunction.”
“Zucker has come to believe that taking the view that kids are born transgender ultimately produces more transgender people. ‘By declaring the child as transgendered at, say, age 3 or age 4 or age 6, and then saying in a sense, ‘Go with the flow,’ … that will impact, I believe, on how the kid’s gender identity differentiates,’ he says. In other words, allowing a child like Jonah to transition in kindergarten will essentially track him into becoming a transgender adult.”
“Despite these difficulties, Zucker clearly feels it’s important to at least attempt change. He points out that the burden of living as the opposite gender is great, and should not be casually embraced. ‘We’re not talking about minor medical treatments. … You’re talking about lifelong hormonal treatment; you’re talking about serious and substantive surgery,’ he says. … In the meantime, though, Zucker’s approach continues to thrive. He says nearly 80 children are on the waiting list at his clinic in Toronto.”
“I would predict if we followed kids, longitudinally, who are being told ‘do what you want’ — or encouraging early gender role change — they would be much more likely in adolescence or adulthood to go through hormonal and surgical sex change than kids being seen in a psychotherapeutic way, and even probably than kids where people don’t do anything active.”
“But I don’t think the goal of therapy is to make a child feel bad about who they are. It’s helping kids understand themselves better and what might be causing them to develop what I call a “fantasy solution,” that being the other sex will make them happy.”
“Zucker thinks that an important goal of treatment is to help the children accept their birth sex and to avoid becoming transsexual. His experience has convinced him that if a boy with GID becomes an adolescent with GID, the chances that he will become an adult with GID and seek a sex change are much higher. And he thinks that the kind of therapy he practices helps reduce this risk.”
“It is the disordered and chaotic family, according to Zucker, that can’t get its act together to present a consistent and sensible reaction to the child, which would be something like the following: ‘We love you, but you are a boy, not a girl. Wishing to be a girl will only make you unhappy in the long run, and pretending to be a girl will only make your life around others harder.’”
“The second prong is therapy for the boy, to help him adjust to the idea that he cannot become a girl, and to help teach him how to minimize social ostracism.”
“Zucker says simply: ‘The Barbies have to go.’ He has nothing against Barbie dolls, of course. He means something more general. Feminine toys and accoutrements—including Barbie dolls, girls’ shoes, dresses, purses, and princess gowns—are no longer to be tolerated at home, much less bought for the child. Zucker believes that toleration and encouragement of feminine play and dress prevents the child from accepting his maleness.”
“The central difference between Zucker and his critics on the left is that Zucker believes that most boys who play with girls’ things often enough to earn a diagnosis of GID would become girls if they could. Failure to intervene increases the chances of transsexualism in adulthood, which Zucker considers a bad outcome. For one, sex change surgery is major and permanent, and can have serious side effects. Why put boys at risk for this when they can become gay men happy to be men?”
-Dr. Kenneth Zucker, Psychologist-in-Chief and Head of the Gender Identity Service in the Child, Youth, and Family Program at CAMH
“Just snap out of it”? “Defeat denial”? Really, CAMH?

this dude is literally evil

redfivetwo:

zjemptv:

anadhelp:

May is Mental Health Awareness Month—it’s time we start talking about mental illness & break the silence.

It’s helpful to have parents set limits on things like cross-dressing, which many parents have not done before coming to us.”

“Told of the Andersons and their plans to enroll Nicole in school as a girl, Zucker says he’s concerned that the Andersons have been swayed by an activist transsexual agenda and are ignoring the possibility that Nicole might simply be a troubled child. ‘Let’s see if there are ways to try and help this child work this through,’ he says. ‘Instead, they’re going to cement this in more and more.’ He says that what the Andersons are doing could be considered ‘some type of emotional neglect.’

“Zucker, who has worked with this population for close to 30 years, has a very specific method for treating these children. Whenever Zucker encounters a child younger than 10 with gender identity disorder, he tries to make the child comfortable with the sex he or she was born with. So, to treat Bradley, Zucker explained to Carol that she and her husband would have to radically change their parenting. Bradley would no longer be allowed to spend time with girls. He would no longer be allowed to play with girlish toys or pretend that he was a female character. Zucker said that all of these activities were dangerous to a kid with gender identity disorder. He explained that unless Carol and her husband helped the child to change his behavior, as Bradley grew older, he likely would be rejected by both peer groups. Boys would find his feminine interests unappealing. Girls would want more boyish boys. Bradley would be an outcast.”

“Zucker says the homosexuality metaphor is wrong. He proposes another metaphor: racial identity disorder. ‘Suppose you were a clinician and a 4-year-old black kid came into your office and said he wanted to be white. Would you go with that? … I don’t think we would,’ Zucker says. If a black kid walked into a therapist’s office saying he was really white, the goal of pretty much any therapist out there would be to make him try to feel more comfortable being black. They would assume his mistaken beliefs were the product of a dysfunctional environment — a dysfunctional family or a dysfunctional cultural environment that led him or her to engage in this wrongheaded and dangerous fantasy. This is how Zucker sees gender-disordered kids. He sees these behaviors primarily as a product of dysfunction.”

“Zucker has come to believe that taking the view that kids are born transgender ultimately produces more transgender people. ‘By declaring the child as transgendered at, say, age 3 or age 4 or age 6, and then saying in a sense, ‘Go with the flow,’ … that will impact, I believe, on how the kid’s gender identity differentiates,’ he says. In other words, allowing a child like Jonah to transition in kindergarten will essentially track him into becoming a transgender adult.”

“Despite these difficulties, Zucker clearly feels it’s important to at least attempt change. He points out that the burden of living as the opposite gender is great, and should not be casually embraced. ‘We’re not talking about minor medical treatments. … You’re talking about lifelong hormonal treatment; you’re talking about serious and substantive surgery,’ he says. … In the meantime, though, Zucker’s approach continues to thrive. He says nearly 80 children are on the waiting list at his clinic in Toronto.”

I would predict if we followed kids, longitudinally, who are being told ‘do what you want’ — or encouraging early gender role change — they would be much more likely in adolescence or adulthood to go through hormonal and surgical sex change than kids being seen in a psychotherapeutic way, and even probably than kids where people don’t do anything active.”

“But I don’t think the goal of therapy is to make a child feel bad about who they are. It’s helping kids understand themselves better and what might be causing them to develop what I call a “fantasy solution,” that being the other sex will make them happy.

“Zucker thinks that an important goal of treatment is to help the children accept their birth sex and to avoid becoming transsexual. His experience has convinced him that if a boy with GID becomes an adolescent with GID, the chances that he will become an adult with GID and seek a sex change are much higher. And he thinks that the kind of therapy he practices helps reduce this risk.”

“It is the disordered and chaotic family, according to Zucker, that can’t get its act together to present a consistent and sensible reaction to the child, which would be something like the following: ‘We love you, but you are a boy, not a girl. Wishing to be a girl will only make you unhappy in the long run, and pretending to be a girl will only make your life around others harder.’”

“The second prong is therapy for the boy, to help him adjust to the idea that he cannot become a girl, and to help teach him how to minimize social ostracism.”

“Zucker says simply: ‘The Barbies have to go.’ He has nothing against Barbie dolls, of course. He means something more general. Feminine toys and accoutrements—including Barbie dolls, girls’ shoes, dresses, purses, and princess gowns—are no longer to be tolerated at home, much less bought for the child. Zucker believes that toleration and encouragement of feminine play and dress prevents the child from accepting his maleness.

“The central difference between Zucker and his critics on the left is that Zucker believes that most boys who play with girls’ things often enough to earn a diagnosis of GID would become girls if they could. Failure to intervene increases the chances of transsexualism in adulthood, which Zucker considers a bad outcome. For one, sex change surgery is major and permanent, and can have serious side effects. Why put boys at risk for this when they can become gay men happy to be men?

-Dr. Kenneth Zucker, Psychologist-in-Chief and Head of the Gender Identity Service in the Child, Youth, and Family Program at CAMH

“Just snap out of it”? “Defeat denial”? Really, CAMH?

this dude is literally evil

pjcalamity:

neekcreep:

hogwarts-express:

fuckin lilo

I’m fucking dying

LILO NO

lilo is me 

native-detroiter:

nightbringer24:

peckerhead-red:

blonde-swanson:

girljanitor:

blonde-swanson:

thatqueerchick:

sourcedumal:

girljanitor:

innocent-bystanders-inc:

nudiemuse:

princelesscomic:

girljanitor:

Self Evident Truths

S. Ross Browne

Ummm…I am so VERY into this right now!

But Black people in period or fantasy settings totally makes the stories unreal.

Also holy shit I love these.

How come I don’t run across this stuff regularly?

Because of racism and the retroactive erasure of POC in Medieval Europe. Pretty much the same reason you almost never see these works of art either unless you’re already looking for them:

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

image

But it’s SOOOOOOOOOOO UNREALISTIC TO SEE BLACK PEOPLE IN MEDIEVAL EUROPE!!!!

/sarcasm

Oh the last picture is the cutest.

On a more relevant note, this reminds me of when people are like ‘We can’t have POC in Lord of the Rings (or whatever) because it’s unrealistic.’

OH BUT HOBBITS AND ELVES AND MAGIC RINGS AND WIZARDS ARE FUCKING REAL, RIGHT?

There were no people of color in the Lord of the Rings because it was based off of pre-long distance sea travel British Isles and the different races were hobbits and elves and men, etc

There were actually men with darker skin tones that would have resembled folks from the Middle East

The Orcs were straight up #000000 black in many cases, though inb4 “THAT’S RACIST CAUSE THEY’RE EVIL”, Orcs were a race created by corrupt men and servants of Morgoth and their #000000 color was to symbolize darkness as in mankind’s fear of the dark and unknown

I swear to god I’m going to have to blacklist Lord of the Rings because of this bullshit

Think before you speak

Do some fucking research

Jesus

Fucking

Christ

GEE IT ONLY TOOK LIKE 6K NOTES BEFORE THIS SHITASS RACISM APOLOGIST SHOWED UP

image

“DO SOME FUCKING RESEARCH”

image

ON LORD OF THE RINGS, NOT REAL LIFE

I KNOW IT’S HARD BUT IF YOU READ IN TO THE HISTORY OF MIDDLE EARTH IT’D BE WAY LESS “RACIST” IN YOUR EYES

These people are literal children. Anything slightly different from their view and they shit themselves.

I’ll be honest: black people in European period dress just look strange as fuck to me. It really suggests to me that they just don’t really give a shit about their own culture.

well I guess you’d better build a time machine go back in time and tell your royals to live us the hell alone

andrewhussiesbosom:

if you nice to me then I’ll

image

but if you give me shit Imma

image